similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to cedel.se

Cedel alternatives & similar sites

CSC | The Most Security Conscious Domains Provider | CSC — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
cyberhygien.nu ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	JOIN THE DIGITAL TRUST HUB \| OneMore Secure	sv	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
intelsquirrel.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Squirrel Security \| Experter inom Pentesting & Cybersäkerhet	sv	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
netmaker.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	NetMaker Consulting Group – Säkra Betalningsfiler	sv	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
skogsbrev.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Skogsbrev — en krypterad kanal på tre sekunder	sv	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hyker.io ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Cybersäkerhet, helt enkelt - Hyker	sv	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
24sju.tech ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	24Sju	sv	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dotkeeeper.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Dotkeeper - Professionell Domänhantering och Varumärkesskydd	sv	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
dotkeep.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Dotkeeper - Professionell Domänhantering och Varumärkesskydd	sv	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
dotkeeper.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Dotkeeper - Professionell Domänhantering och Varumärkesskydd	sv	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
dotkeeperab.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Dotkeeper - Professionell Domänhantering och Varumärkesskydd	sv	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
dotkeeperescrow.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Dotkeeper - Professionell Domänhantering och Varumärkesskydd	sv	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
dotkeepers.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Dotkeeper - Professionell Domänhantering och Varumärkesskydd	sv	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
dotkeepr.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Dotkeeper - Professionell Domänhantering och Varumärkesskydd	sv	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
dotkeper.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Dotkeeper - Professionell Domänhantering och Varumärkesskydd	sv	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
dotkiper.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Dotkeeper - Professionell Domänhantering och Varumärkesskydd	sv	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
dottkeeper.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Dotkeeper - Professionell Domänhantering och Varumärkesskydd	sv	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
atrima.net ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	ATRIMA Consulting AB	sv	computer-networking	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cryvanta.io ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Cryvanta — Custom System Builds (and pentest on top)	sv	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.