similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to cecra.com

Cecra alternatives & similar sites

This page does not exist | Springer — International Publisher — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Publishing Industry →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
healthinbedrijf.eu ↗	85 match 1 shared topics	This page does not exist \| Springer — International Publisher	European Union en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pubcheck.com ↗	85 match 1 shared topics	This page does not exist \| Springer — International Publisher	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
interspp.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	International Scientific Practical Publication	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
internationalbrosinc.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	International Brothers \| Distribution, Publishing, and Sync	en	publishing-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
intwebexpress.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	International Web exPress	en	publishing-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
intapuba.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Journal Home:: International and Public Affairs:: Science Publishing Group	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
intjop.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Journal Home:: International Journal of Philosophy:: Science Publishing Group	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
internationalhealthpublishing.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	International Health Publishing - Book Publishing for Professionals - Home	en	publishing-industry Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
intjoes.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Journal Home:: International Journal of European Studies:: Science Publishing Group	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
skawy.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	SKAWY — Independent Brand & Publisher	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
neonwide.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	digital publisher tools	en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
intjber.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Journal Home:: International Journal of Business and Economics Research:: Science Publishing Group	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
authorsrights.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	IFJ. International Federation of Journalists. AUTHORS' RIGHTS CAMPAIGN	en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
publishedge.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Homepage - PublishEdge	en	publishing-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2hform.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Create, publish and distribute interactive digital publications	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
publicauthor.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Public Author – Professional Publishing and Website Services	en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andipublisher.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Andi Publisher	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gazia.ai ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Gazia - Creative Digital Publisher	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.