Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to cdcookingbook.com

Кулинарна книга на CD · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
27match
izkushenie.com
| Кулинарно изкушение
0 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryfood-and-drink
24match
mama-culinar.com
Мама Кулинар – Рецепти за всяка трапеза
0 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categorycooking
22match
heydaniella.com
Hey Daniella - За готвенето и сладката страна на живота
0 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categorycooking
22match
alive-table.com
Жива Трапеза | Практична Книга за Буркани, Сушене, Фризер и По-Малко Похабяване
0 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categorycooking
21match
mamagotvi.com
MamaGotvi.com - Рецептите на - Мама Готви
0 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categorycooking
21match
malkihapki.com
Малки хапки - полезни рецепти за деца от 1 до 3 години
0 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categorycooking
21match
bojaria.com
STEFKA NOEVA - Автентични домашни туршии и консерви от България
0 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categorycooking
21match
apicius.net
De re coquionaria - Римската кухня - De re coquinaria-За готварското изкуство
0 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categorycooking
21match
jynucia.com
Курсове по Сироварство у Дома - CheeseHome Bulgaria
0 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categorycooking
20match
genoveff.com
Genoveff.com | частица от моя свят
0 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categorycooking
20match
fehawk.com
Fehawk.com » Изрази себе си сподели своите идеи
0 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categorycooking
20match
keksbook.com
Keksbook
0 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categorycooking
20match
makerbg.com
makerbg
0 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categorycooking

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.