Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to cdbfoster.com

Christopher Dylan Bruch Foster · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
amz-x.com
Christopher Crouse | AMZ-X
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
pixel-storage.com
Christopher Tumminaro — Front End Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
oshafoster.com
Osha Foster
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
cformandoy.com
Cristopher Formandoy | Lead Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
dbrews.com
Dan Brewster
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
nuotsu.dev
Mitchell Christ | nuotsu
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
odicho.dev
Chris Odicho
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
ericchristine.com
Eric Christine | Web Developer | Home
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
nscampfire.com
Overview | nscampfire.com | Chris Walters
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
rylanraj.com
Rylan Raj | Welcome
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
sandstads.com
Christian Sandstad — Application Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
alberssoftware.com
Chris Albers Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
c-meyer.com
Christian Meyer — Business Central Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
luxferre.dev
Chris Milne - Lux-Ferre.dev
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
bertiful.com
Chris Berthe’s home on the web
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
page-mon.com
PageMon
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
alanfan.com
Alan Fan
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
1stopamc.com
1StopAMC
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.