Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to cbateman.com

Chris Bateman · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
bertiful.com
Chris Berthe’s home on the web
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
cdrum.com
Chris Drumgoole
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
plainolddesign.com
CMP - Chris Putnam
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
alberssoftware.com
Chris Albers Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
bytesbyblinken.com
Chris Hall - Software Engineer Portfolio | BytesByBlinken
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
nuotsu.dev
Mitchell Christ | nuotsu
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
platerocm.com
Chris Platero — Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
luxferre.dev
Chris Milne - Lux-Ferre.dev
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
akshayraichur.com
Akshay Raichur — Full Stack Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
olesdidukh.dev
Oles Didukh - Senior Front-End Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
andrewavina.com
Andrew Avina - Frontend Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
rrawat.com
Rishabh Rawat's Blog
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
pikaard.com
Bryan | Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
oreqizer.com
Boris Petrenko
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
gerardogranados.com
Gerardo Granados | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
cd-empinado.com
Christian Dave Empinado | Full Stack Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
ayushijha.com
Ayushi Jha Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
hyeeessence.com
Hyejin Hwang - Front-end Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.