similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to cats-network.org

Cats Network alternatives & similar sites

Centre for Applied Turkey Studies - Center for Applied Turkey Studies — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Politics →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
cats-network.eu ↗	100 match 2 shared topics	Centre for Applied Turkey Studies - Center for Applied Turkey Studies	European Union en	politics TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cats-network.com ↗	100 match 2 shared topics	Centre for Applied Turkey Studies - Center for Applied Turkey Studies	en	politics TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cips-indonesia.org ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Home \| Center for Indonesian Policy Studies \| Think Tank	en	political-issues-and-policy Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csis.org ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	CSIS \| Center for Strategic and International Studies	en	politics Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 1
cep.eu ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Home \| cep - Centre for European Policy Network	European Union en	politics TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
againstcorruption.eu ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	ERCAS – European Research Centre for Anti-Corruption and State-Building	European Union en	political-issues-and-policy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cuncr.org ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Home - Center for United Nations Constitutional Research	en	political-issues-and-policy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
feps-europe.eu ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Foundation for European Progressive Studies -	European Union en	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
cssd-ngo.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	ISSD-NM – THE INSTITUTE FOR SECURITY STUDIES AND DEVELOPMENT-NORTH MACEDONIA	en	politics WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
equitableworld.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Center for Equitable Policy in a Changing World \| Pro pluribus	en	politics WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atlanticinitiative.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Atlantic Initiative \| Center for Security and Justice Research	en	political-issues-and-policy WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
migrationpolicycentre.eu ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Homepage - Migration Policy Centre	European Union en	political-issues-and-policy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eias.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	EIAS – The European Institute for Asian Studies	en	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atlanticprovspolsciassociation.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Atlantic Provinces Political Studies Association	en	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ceegendernetwork.eu ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	CEE Gender Network - The Central and Eastern European Network for Gender Issues	European Union en	political-issues-and-policy Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
hoskinsonpolicy.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Hoskinson Government & Policy Center	United States~ en	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
biepag.eu ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	BiEPAG - Home	European Union en	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
protectmiworkers.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Labor Policy Initiative – Mackinac Center	United States~ en	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.