similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to catibook.com

Catibook alternatives & similar sites

Catibook - Booking Management Platform — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Software And Applications →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
paltty.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	PALTTY - Procurement Management System	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stoneity.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Stoneity - Project and Work Management Platform - Work Management, Service Management	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
redarrowsoftware.co.uk ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Hawk - job management software	GB en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
doprocure.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	VMS - Vendor Management System	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
studioopps.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	SOMS - Studio Operations Management System	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kvokye.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Next-Gen Field Service Management Software	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kwentahub.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	KwentaHub \| Hardware Store Management Software	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
finworks.co.uk ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Data Management & Workflow Software UK \| Finworks	GB en	software-and-applications HubSpot	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
clickpm.io ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	ClickPM — Multi-Site Project Management Software	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2meters.app ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Virtual Smart Queue Management System \| Home	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
panther-tech.io ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Zorelo - All in One Business Management Software	en	software-and-applications WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chronosoftsolutions.co.uk ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Chronosoft \| Incident & Case Management Software	GB en	software-and-applications WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
idocdms.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Enterprise Document Management & Workflow Automation \| i-doc	IN~ en	software-and-applications WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
pro-forms.co.uk ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Field Service Management Software & Asset Tracking – Simplified	GB en	software-and-applications WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fmsoftware.co.uk ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Field Service Management Software — FMSoftware	GB en	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fm-software.co.uk ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Field Service Management Software — FMSoftware	GB en	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agilitysystems.net ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Agility System - Process-based Document Management System	en	software-and-applications WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agilitysystem.net ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Agility System - Process-based Document Management System	en	software-and-applications WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.