similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to cathyrigg.com

Cathy Rigg | Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

caitlinupshall.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

angelalgold.com

Angela L Gold | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Shelly Oria | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

moravenauthor.com

Mo Raven | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

anniequinnwrites.com

Annie Quinn | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

camkingsley.com

Cam Kingsley | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

madisoncoutsauthor.com

Madison Couts | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

susanbiggar.com

Susan Biggar | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

cameldoc.co.uk 🇬🇧

Carolyn Ellis | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

cakewithnonna.com

Carmela Bruno | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

aneliaschutte.com

Anelia Schutte | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

ettenigsayambooks.com

Ettenig Sayam | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Essie Bode | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

rick-burnett.com

Rick Burnett | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

sheillajones.com

Sheilla Jones | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Anna Qu: Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

richardneer.com

Richard Neer | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

HOME | Ann Ornie Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.