Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to cathymonetti.com

Cathy Rigg | Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
caitlinupshall.com
Home | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
angelalgold.com
Angela L Gold | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
shellyoria.com
Shelly Oria | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
anniequinnwrites.com
Annie Quinn | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
susanbiggar.com
Susan Biggar | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
cameldoc.co.uk 🇬🇧
Carolyn Ellis | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
cakewithnonna.com
Carmela Bruno | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
aneliaschutte.com
Anelia Schutte | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
ettenigsayambooks.com
Ettenig Sayam | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
essiebode.com
Essie Bode | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
sheillajones.com
Sheilla Jones | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
annaqu.com
Anna Qu: Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
annornie.com
HOME | Ann Ornie Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
garyjaypool.com
Gary Jay Pool | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
esthersanniauthor.com
Esther L Sanni | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
helennewmanwood.com
Helen Newman Wood | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
maceecarson.com
Macee Carson | Author | Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
andreayarbough.com
Andrea Yarbough | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.