similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to catherinegrabar.com

Catherinegrabar alternatives & similar sites

Catherine Grabar | Product Design Leader — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Executive Leadership And Management →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
nashatwork.com ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Product Design Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
uu-v.com ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	David Vuu — Strategic Product Design Leader	AU~ en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pixeltoprocess.com ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Pixel to Process \| Product Design Leadership with Impact	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
johnchoquette.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	John Choquette · Product Design Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designleaders.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Design Leaders	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
designwitheli.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Eliana Alba \| Product & Design Leader for Mission-Driven Ventures	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jonathanmontalvo.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Jonathan Montalvo \| UX Design Leader & Super IC	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carowgatti.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Caroline Williams Gatti - Product + Design Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
piyushsinha.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Piyush Sinha - Design & Product Leader Fintech · Travel · Platform SaaS \| Piyush Sinha	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
natelevin.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Nate Levin — Senior Product Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
salciotti.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Victor Salciotti, Product Design VP and Leadership Mentor	en	executive-leadership-and-management Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
utdexp.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	United Experience - Design Leadership - UX, Brand, Product	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vaibhavbhore.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Vaibhav Bhore \| Product & Project Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joemanbeck.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Joe Manbeck — Product Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joshuarudd.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Joshua Rudd – Product Designer & Strategist	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
uxretreat.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	UX Retreat Bali 2026 — Leadership Residency for UX & Product Design Leaders	ID~ en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designdecoded.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Scrivner: Executive Design Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joeburkel.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Joe Burkel - Principal Design Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.