similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to catekompare.com

Catekompare alternatives & similar sites

Cate Kompare – User Experience Researcher and Information Architect — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Web Design And Html →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
adamgbanks.co.uk ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Adam Banks - User Researcher and UX Founder	GB en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
usablesolutions.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Usable Solutions by Jeff Brace - User Experience and Usability Consulting	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designingforeasy.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Portfolio \| Sean Connolly User Experience	en	web-design-and-html Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
css3clickchart.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	CSS Click Chart \| CSS3 Browser Support and Information	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
josephibarra.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Joseph Ibarra \| Product Design, User Experience	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joyfuluser.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	User Joy - User Experience that fosters delighted users	en	web-design-and-html WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
luciamata.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Lucia Mata, MS – UX Researcher	en	web-design-and-html WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitaldots.co.uk ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Web Design, User Experience and Digital Branding that puts customers first	GB en	web-design-and-html Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adammarston.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Adam Marston \| Freelance User Experience (UX) Designer in Germany	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
avegailtizon.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Avegail Tizon \| User Experience Designer \| People-Friendly Websites	en	web-design-and-html Squarespace	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lucasgard.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Lucas Gard \| Web Design \| Graphic Design \| User Experience	en	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
farajbalousha.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Faraj Balousha - Architect, Webmaster and Internet Marketer	en	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3buro.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Experience Bureau	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3wplacelab.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Welcome to 3wplace Lab – A Space for Experimentation and Growth”	en	web-design-and-html WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
johnsontien.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Johnson Tien – Digital / Visual Information Specialist	en	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nathanalbertassi.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Nathan Albertassi – UX Designer & Researcher	en	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nayerianwebsite.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Sara – UX/UI Researcher, Web/Graphic Designer	en	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adam-meyer.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Adam Stern Meyer - Interaction + Experience Designer	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.