Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to carnap.io

Welcome To Carnap! · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
recalarm.com
Welcome to Python.org
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
js2brain.com
Welcome to JS 2 brain!
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
silentbyte.dev
Welcome to Silent Byte
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
aavalam.org
Welcome to AAVALAM.org!
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
mstantchev.com
Welcome
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
campug.uk 🇬🇧
Welcome to CamPUG | campug.github.io
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
cppbytes.com
Welcome - C++ Bytes
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
owenrudge.com
owenrudge.net - Welcome to owenrudge.net
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
asreml.org
ASReml Knowledge Base • Welcome to ASReml
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
lossofgenerality.com
Welcome to CCN Studios | Free Form Programming Language
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
fromfogtolighthouse.com
Welcome - fromFogtoLighthouse
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
assarbad.net
Welcome - Assarbad's homepage [/en/welcome]@assarbad.net
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
alcarney.me
<no title> — Alex Carney
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
anotherconstruct.com
Home Page
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
add1tocobol.com
Add 1 to COBOL — My Homepage
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
mradionov.com
Home Page
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
abdel.me
Home | Abdel
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
jullianmercier.com
Home | Swift
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.