Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to carlosantos.dev

Carlo | Creative Portfolio 👨‍💻 · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
82match
silviapinho.com
Silvia Pinho | Portfolio
1 shared topicsart-and-photography
81match
pamelalum.com
Pamela Lum – Portfolio
1 shared topicsart-and-photography
81match
anjalijawa.org
Anjali Jawa – Portfolio
1 shared topicsart-and-photography
81match
lucakiknadze.com
Luca Kiknadze – Portfolio
1 shared topicsart-and-photography
76match
msayyaf.com
Mohamed Sayyaf | Portfolio
1 shared topicsart-and-photography
75match
corrinawaxman.com
Corrina Waxman – Portfolio of Art
1 shared topicsart-and-photography
75match
abigailbrubaker.com
Abigail Brubaker
1 shared topicsart-and-photography
75match
athossantiago.com
Athos Santiago - Art Director
1 shared topicsart-and-photography
75match
coryhallcreative.com
CREATIVE PORTFOLIO
1 shared topicsart-and-photography
75match
efthevelina.com
Evelina Efthimiou
1 shared topicsart-and-photography
75match
julia-francis.com
Julia Francis
1 shared topicsart-and-photography
75match
lucyboseley.com
Lucy Boseley
1 shared topicsart-and-photography
75match
msouzapedro.com
Pedro Souza
1 shared topicsart-and-photography
75match
creativelycassie.com
Cassie's Portfolio
1 shared topicsart-and-photography
75match
recapturedjoy.com
Joyana Richer – A Portfolio and Creative Space
1 shared topicsart-and-photography
75match
creativerobindesign.com
PORTFOLIO | Creative Robin
1 shared topicsart-and-photography
74match
alexcarvalho.org
Alex portfolio
1 shared topicsart-and-photography
74match
luccourtois.com
Luc Courtois Portfolio
1 shared topicsart-and-photography

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.