Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to cariwolfson.com

Cari Wolfson - Digital Experience Design · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
kowaltzke.com
Adam Kowaltzke | Experience Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
cacto-ed.com
Cacto-Experience Design
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
hectormavrakis.com
Hector Mavrakis - Experience Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
heidiworkshop.com
Heidi Lee Experience Design 2025
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
isaibars.com
Isa Ibars — Experience Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
sharp-links.com
SharpLinks | Digital Experiences
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
andymule.com
Andy Muehlhausen - Experience Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
cagriozen.com
Aycal - Experience Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
pixurf.com
Pixurf - Creating Digital Experiences
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
octopd.com
OCTO | Strategy, Product, and Experience Design
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
hello-xlab.com
Hello xLAB - Experience Design Consultancy
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
isometricshadows.com
Ben Martin - Experience Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
andreamangone.com
Andrea Mangone | Product Experience Design
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
andrewgatto.com
Andrew Gatto | Product & Experience Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
nvinteractive.com
NV Interactive — Crafted Digital Experiences
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
ankitadutta.com
Ankita Dutta | User and Learning Experience Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
annalisaagoston.com
Annalisa Agoston — Creative & Experience Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
anupamsarkar.com
Anupam Sarkar| Experience Design Strategy
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.