similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to carinyasharples.com

Carinyasharples alternatives & similar sites

CARINYA SHARPLES – Writer, Facilitator, Journalist, Editor — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Freelance Writing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
denniscoday.com ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Dennis Coday – Writer, journalist, editor, educator	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
caseyriankelly.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Casey Kelly – Writer, editor, producer, journalist, researcher.	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
luciampalmer.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Lucia Palmer – Writer, editor, teacher.	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carolinebodian.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	caro writes -Writer, Fiction, Nonfiction, Journalist, NYC	en	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samanthamoorewrites.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Samantha Writes Moore – Technical Writer, Copy Editor, Journalist	en	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abbyjeffers.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Abby Jeffers – Copywriter, journalist, researcher	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carolineigo.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Caroline Igo – Writer – Editor – Journalist	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
caseylew.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	CASEY LEWIS – Writer, Editor	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
caseyziegler.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Casey Ziegler \| Journalist, Writer & Editor in NYC	US~ en	freelance-writing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sambritt5.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Sam Britt – Writer-Journalist-Copywriter-Storyteller	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
natalieburg.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Natalie Burg – writer, editor, type-A Midwesterner	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nathaliegraham.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Nathalie Graham – Writer, journalist, interested in the world and its people	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
saposses.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Shayna Posses – editor, writer, storyteller	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nancybaye.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Nancy Baye - Content Strategist, Editor, Writer - About Nancy Baye Bio	en	freelance-writing Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sanasiwolop.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Sana Siwolop – Journalist, content coach, educator	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ltancs.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Linda Tancs – Writer	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
caseyobrienwrites.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Casey O'Brien, Writer and Journalist	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
luigibenetton.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Luigi Benetton – Copywriter, technical writer, translator (FR>EN, ES>EN, IT>EN), journalist	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.