Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to capu.dev

Capu — TL;DR for developer documentation · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
fusionjs.com
Fusion.js Documentation
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
owenbush.dev
Owen Bush — Senior Developer · Denver, CO
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
lourah.com
Welcome | LourahJs Documentation
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
kaanbilgili.com
Kaan Bilgili — Junior Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
alexanderwang.dev
Alexander Wang | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
ashokj.app
Ashok J — Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
jtreminio.com
Juan Treminio - Senior Web Developer Blog
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
ahmad-sultan.net
Flutter Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
lorisroncali.com
Loris Roncali — Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
muradhamad.dev
Murad Hamad - Junior Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
alessandrorossi.tech
Alessandro Rossi — Fullstack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
acceleraterun.digital
AccelerateRun — Runtime Optimization for JavaScript Developers
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
bunea.com
Razvan | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
alexandralim.dev
Alexandra Lim | Front End Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
effectif.com
Effectif Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
funkycorgi.com
Olena Kolyada — Backend Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
fydevs.com
Fendy Yulianto — C# / ASP.NET Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
refif.dev
Refif Ilan | Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.