Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to captmichael.dev

Michael C. | Solo Founder · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
mplevy.com
Michael Levy
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
mwdiamond.com
Michael Diamond
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
mpmoritz.com
Michael Moritz
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
mwskirpan.com
Michael Skirpan
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
attnom.com
Attnom World | Solutions and Prism
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
corseri.com
Michael Corseri | Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
mwingrove.com
Michael Wingrove
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
angstygaijin.com
Michael Migliacio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
msilb7.com
Michael Silberling
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
butlerpc.net
Home | Michael Butler
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
jrburgoa.com
Jesus Rafael Burgoa — Engineer & Founder
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
brunomichaelis.com
Bruno Michaelis
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
aswedeingermany.com
Michael Eriksson’s Homepage
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
avigoldman.com
Avi Goldman — Builder / Designer / Founder
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
loney.dev
Michael Loney - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
mvorisek.com
Mvorisek - Michael Voříšek
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
mwdenis.com
Michael Denis — Hardware • FPGA • RTL
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
testprincipia.com
TestPrincipia | Michael Stahl
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.