Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to cannect.me

Lynne Wainfan, Ph.D. · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
brxengineering.com
Brentan Alexander, Ph.D.
1 shared topicsscience
64match
atticusstovall.com
Dr. Atticus Stovall, Ph.D. - Remote sensing scientist | Forest ecologist
1 shared topicsscience
64match
atomicinfantarchive.com
Atomic Infant Archive
1 shared topicsscience
63match
buildem-materials.com
Paul W. Meyer, Ph.D. – A short website about Paul's research career
1 shared topicsscience
63match
andrewbrownphd.com
Andrew W Brown, PhD
1 shared topicsscience
63match
byrdnick.com
Nick Byrd, Ph.D. | Using science and technology to understand and improve how we think.
1 shared topicsscience
63match
juliekjohnson.com
Julie Katherine Johnson, PhD
1 shared topicsscience
63match
siskasummit.com
login | SISKA Platform
1 shared topicsscience
63match
juliethebugologist.com
Julie A Reynolds, Ph.D. – Scientific Research, Communication, and Outreach
1 shared topicsscience
62match
corscientia.com
corscientia | Connected science, made playful
1 shared topicsscience
62match
paleoperez.com
Victor Perez, PhD
1 shared topicsscience
62match
2ndinfantry.net
Science News - 2ndinfantry.net
1 shared topicsscience
62match
500queerscientists.com
500 Queer Scientists Visibility Campaign : 500 Queer Scientists
1 shared topicsscience
62match
acousticecologylab.org
Acoustic Ecology Lab — Arizona State University
1 shared topicsscience
62match
funsciencelab.com
Science for Kids | Fun Science Lab Educational Platform
1 shared topicsscience
62match
paigekouba.com
Paige Kouba, PhD
1 shared topicsscience
62match
annedagg.net
Anne Dagg | Author, Researcher & Speaker
1 shared topicsscience
62match
2sistersinstem.com
2 Sisters In STEM
1 shared topicsscience

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.