Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to canmi.net

Canmi · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
a7mdd.dev
Ahmed Almerri — Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
sidlamba.com
Full-Stack · Mobile · Cloud
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
abhishekbr.dev
Abhishek BR
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
bymykel.com
ByMykel
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
aa11.dev
Adrian Acosta
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
abouthugo.dev
Hugo Perdomo
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
edduran.com
Eduardo Duran
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
jsonguyen.com
Jonathan Nguyen | Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
funcoder.com
Jonathan Buckland — Indie SaaS, Built in Public with Rails — Funcoder
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
moustaphandoye.com
Moustapha Ndoye
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
moustapha.dev
Moustapha Ndoye
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
reddemonfox.com
Welcome to RedDemonFox's Personal Site | RedDemonFox
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
albertovilches.dev
Alberto Vilches
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
andyone.me
Anton Novojilov - ESSENTIAL KAOS, Quantum-A, Bauman Moscow State Technical University | about.me
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
ashishgurjar.dev
Ashish Gurjar - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
24setup.com
24Setup | Home
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
andrewbeaver.dev
Andrew Beaver | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
juanca.app
Juan Carrillo | juanca.org
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.