Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to canisik.tech

Dev Portfolio | Projects & Skills · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
crantonomo.com
Portfolio
2 shared topicscareers
70match
bryanelmer.com
Bryan's Portfolio
2 shared topicscareers
70match
owenwatt.com
Owen Watt | Portfolio
2 shared topicscareers
69match
ebukapeter.com
My Portfolio
2 shared topicscareers
68match
muhammedgasal.com
Gasal | Personal Portfolio
2 shared topicscareers
67match
aboudhasan.tech
Aboud Hasan - Portfolio
2 shared topicscareers
67match
mustafavardal.com
Mustafa Vardal Portfolio
2 shared topicscareers
67match
ankurgangwar.com
Portfolio of Ankur Gangwar - Backend Engineer
2 shared topicscareers
67match
sirajakram.com
Siraj Akram — Portfolio
2 shared topicscareers
66match
aniketnagapure.dev
Aniket Nagapure | Senior React Engineer
2 shared topicscareers
66match
coulterpeterson.com
Coulter Peterson - Portfolio
2 shared topicscareers
66match
cunninghamcloudcode.com
Hakeem Cunningham - Portfolio
2 shared topicscareers
66match
alexandrdmitriev.com
Alexandr Dmitriev – Portfolio
2 shared topicscareers
66match
mrafay.com
Muhammad Rafay Khan - Portfolio
2 shared topicscareers
66match
sinalkar.com
Sanjay Sinalkar | Project Specialist II & Platform Engineer
2 shared topicscareers
65match
alexrhessler.com
Alex Hessler - Web Developer Professional Portfolio
2 shared topicscareers
65match
palmettomojo.com
Alicia Brackett - My Resume & Personal Portfolio
2 shared topicscareers
65match
muhammadahmadkhan.com
Full-Stack Engineer | Technical Project Manager | Data Analytics Specialist
2 shared topicscareers

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.