Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to candybukowski.com

Candy Bukowski – Autorin · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
julianedeinert.com
Juliane Deinert – Autorin
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
lotte-woess.com
Lotte Wöss – Autorin
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
pialueddecke.de 🇩🇪
Pia Lüddecke – Autorin
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
jstrobel.com
Joachim Strobel – Autor
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
juliaach.com
Julia Ach – Ach, die Autorin!
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
ebertowski.com
Jürgen Ebertowski – Aikidolehrer – Autor – Künstler
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
junafinn.com
Juna Finn - Autorin
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
adleymarrow.com
Autorin |
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
luciuswinter.com
Lucius Winter – Autorenwebsite
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
aeraofgods.org
Markus Heitz – Autor & Kreativer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
renafischer.com
Home - Autorin Rena Fischer
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
angela-c-popp.com
Angela C Popp – Autorin – Sprecherin – Fotografin
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
cosmicturmoil.com
Ramona Beyer – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
neue-medien-film.de 🇩🇪
Nicolas Rutschmann – Autor | Romane & Sachbücher
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
nicole-siemer-autorin.de 🇩🇪
Moin - nicole-siemer-autorin.de
2 shared topicsfiction
65match
julie-bender.com
Julie Bender | Autorin | Kinderbücher
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
noraphillips.de 🇩🇪
Autorin Nora Phillips
2 shared topicsfiction
65match
aurinvonaderhold.com
Aurin von Aderhold – Eco-Fantasy-Autorin | Indigo Animals
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.