Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to campfirelab.com

Campfire Collaborative · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
modedesignco.com
Mode Design Collaborative
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
georgiakrapf.com
Georgia Krapf | Collaborative Design
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
shawnewbank.com
Shawn Ewbank Design Collaborative
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
hellosignal.com
Signal Workshop | Collaborative by Design
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
3dpcollab.com
3DP Collaborative – Connecting Creativity
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
ocelotstudio.com
ocelot studio | design & collaboration
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
obscure-collective.com
Obscure Collective
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
isaiahrobertson.com
Obcidion – Design Thinking & Collaboration
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
obaaso.com
Obcidion – Design Thinking & Collaboration
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
obcidion.com
Obcidion – Design Thinking & Collaboration
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
occaun.com
Obcidion – Design Thinking & Collaboration
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
madebycampfire.com
Made by Campfire | Aussie-made graphic design.
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
kraalikaacreation.com
Kraalikaa Creation | Kraalikaa Creation (Textile & Art Collaboration Website)
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
itssophiecollins.com
Sophie Collins
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
pixelbytecollective.com
PixelByte Collective
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
kreativeroom.com
Kreative Room
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
annieliughts.com
ANNIE LIU LIGHTING DESIGN – Creator | Collaborator | World-Builder
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
doctorstevebob.com
THE AMAZING LABORATORY OF DOCTOR STEVE BOB
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.