Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to camfrederick.com

Cam Frederick · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
bedobi.com
Bedobi — Fredrik Friis
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
iss-pr.com
Eric Soto
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
jameskuang.com
James Kuang
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
hermanowens.com
Home | Herman Owens
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
itscharlieliu.com
Charlie Liu — Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
cambaffuto.com
Cam Baffuto
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
itomeho.com
Isaac Tomeho
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
anupstha.com
Anup Shrestha
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
bazaardirekt.com
Home corporate
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
camziny.com
Cam Ziny
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
connorhome.dev
Connor Home – Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
dimmadog.com
Dima Vinogradov
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
dimitryvin.com
Dima Vinogradov
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
dimitrioschantzis.com
DimitrisHantzis.com - Software Engineer based in Brighton, UK
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
ismetbilgic.com
Ismet Bilgic | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
caioregis.com
regiscaio (Caio Régis) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
jameelur.com
Jameel Ur Rahman - Software engineer, entrepreneur and writer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
jamesjiracek.com
Jim Jiracek — Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.