Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to cameronharveycode.com

Cameron Harvey · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
camerontaaffe.com
Cameron Taaffe
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
camerondavis.dev
Cameron Davis
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
cameronwebby.com
cameron webby
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
cameronlopez.dev
Cameron Lopez
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
camerondunne.com
Cameron Dunne
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
cameronstanley.com
Cameron Stanley
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
camerongreens.com
Cameron Green's Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
camc8.com
Cameron Hernando Clark — Miami, FL
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
cameronhclark.com
Cameron Hernando Clark — Miami, FL
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
cameronrye.com
Software Engineer & Architect | Cameron Rye
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
cameroncalhoun.dev
Cameron Calhoun Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
cameronjjenkinson.com
Cameron Jenkinson | Cameron Jenkinson
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
israeladebisi.com
Israel Adebisi | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
cameronc.dev
Cameron Cuellar - Software Engineer | Full Stack Developer | Amazon SDE
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
gastongenaud.com
Gaston Genaud | SDET & DevOps Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
cameronsands.com
Cameron's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
cameron-dietz.com
Cameron Dietz | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
divyanshusoni.com
Divyanshu Soni | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.