Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to camerong.com

Cameron Guthrie · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
gtcameron.com
Cameron Codes
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
cameronroberts.uk 🇬🇧
Home | Cameron Roberts
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
ronniri.com
Ron Niri
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
rontech.net
Ron Niri
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
arjungupta.dev
Arjun Gupta
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
aarondsouza.net
Aaron A. D'Souza
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
greghalter.com
Greg Halter - Developer, Father, and Gamer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
boleno.com
Aaron Christiansen
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
filipedev.com
Blog - Filipe Dev
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
0xadb.net
0xADB — Aaron Barton
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
andrewhornstra.com
Niche Content for No One
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
ronfleming.com
Ron Fleming | Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
aaronlindsay.dev
Aaron Lindsay | Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
benjaminguzman.dev
Benjamín Guzmán | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
bguzman.dev
Benjamín Guzmán | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
thrill-project.com
Thrill-Project | The colorful side of code.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
aaronholmes.net
Posts — Bits, Bobs & Breakpoints — Aaron Holmes
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
kubessandra.com
Kubessandra - Software Engineer, entrepreneur and streamer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.