Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to cameroncherry.com

Cameron Cherry | Projects · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
84match
cameroncthomas.com
Cameron C Thomas
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
82match
cameronalsbrook.com
Cameron Alsbrook
2 shared topicsweb-development
82match
andrig.com
Cool vanilla JS projects
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
79match
helloimdevit.com
Tep Devit – Coding Portfolio & Projects Showcase
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
77match
aneeley.com
Andrew Neeley | Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
77match
cadenchau.com
Caden Chau
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
76match
superzekes.com
SuperZekes Profile
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
76match
5edice.com
Web Programming 260
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
anitacheung83.com
Yuk-Yung Anita Cheung
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
mohdmutalib.com
Mohamed | Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
mohamedadebba.com
Mohamed Adebba | Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
molehole.dev
GitHub Profile of MoleHoleDev
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
nutellahabit.com
Aaron Larner's blog - nutellahabit.com
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
shinjokang.com
Shinjo Kang - Passionate Programmer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
antiyes.com
Antiyes – Antiyes doesn't mean no.
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
76match
rileycoulter.com
rileycoulter.com – Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
76match
shenxiaochun.com
Sean — Building things on the internet
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
cainskelton.com
Cain Skelton Dot Com | Cain Skelton on the Internet
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.