Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to calvinfloyd.com

Cal Floyd · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
lostmud.com
Mike Zahalan
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
simoncoulter.com
All posts | Simon Coulter Blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
jread.dev
Jamie Read | Engineering Lead
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
brubkr.com
Joel Brubaker
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
packetsar.com
PackeTsar Blog - Just another engineering blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
auggie.dev
Stephen Augustus
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
lorenzocadamuro.com
Lorenzo Cadamuro | Frontend Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
muratcanuste.com
Home • Murat Can Üste
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
9spire.com
9spire
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andrewkdawson.com
Andrew Kwon Dawson
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
jrtdataview.com
Analytics to Action – Engineering solutions for the data-driven world
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
json-flow.com
JSON Flow
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
reiterate.dev
Zach Blume
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
7pm.dev
7pm.dev | Engineering Leader
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
brukslogic.com
Bruk Belachew — Engineering leader, writer, builder
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
owentbrown.com
Owen Brown
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
mudassirrafiq.com
Mudassir Rafiq - MR
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
oviglo.com
Oviglo
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.