Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to calstephens.tech

Cal Stephens — Blog · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
1inxmail.com
1inxmail — Blogs
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
smssoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Stephen Stewart
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
jshwisolutions.com
Stephen Whitlock
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
jshwi.com
Stephen Whitlock
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
buglens.com
BugLens — Practical Software Testing & DevOps Blog | BugLens
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
andrewstaker.com
Stephen "Andrew" Staker
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
jstewdios.com
Jstewdios — Builder
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
cr8veworks.com
cr8veworks — build log
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
andrewstorrs.com
Andrew Storrs — Bio Sites
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
astorrs.com
Andrew Storrs — Bio Sites
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
sionwilliams.com
Sion's Blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
juiceblog.dev
Juice Blog 🧃
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
signalshiftlabs.com
Signal Shift Labs — We Build Software That Ships
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
justinnwajei.com
JSTN — Boy Genius
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
luizchagas.com
Luiz Chagas — Staff Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
musabadru.com
Musa's Blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
a-z.dev
GBrayUT blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
msyea.com
Simon Mayes — Type II Fun
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.