Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to calmc.dev

Calum | Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
fullstack-dustin.com
Dustin Robison | Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
79match
jujiyangasli.com
Juji | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
mrpaulphan.com
Paul Phan | Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
louisunlimited.com
Louis Qian | Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
asyncdevs.io
Async Developers
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
ebatincelik.com
Batın Çelik | Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
murtazazoaib.com
Murtaza Zoaib | Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
reibjokothow.com
Reibjok Othow | Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
andrewrobles.dev
Andrew Robles | Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
louisbougeard.com
Louis Bougeard | Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
louis.dev
Louis Bougeard | Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
andrewpauluhn.dev
AWP Developer Blog
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
owenallen.dev
Owen Allen - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
sirarsalih.com
A developer's notes
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
akshayk.dev
Akshay Kalathil | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
2ipper.com
2ipper — Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
louieweb.dev
Louie.Dev | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
mtingers.com
mtingers | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.