Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to callum-booth.dev

Callum Booth - Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
abroro.com
abroro - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
jsteagle.dev
Justus - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
regiis.dev
Regis N. - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
alexanderpang.net
Alex Pang - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
andyhume.net
Andy Hume - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
ataekren.com
Ata Ekren - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
ed-li.com
Edward Li - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
mozafarshah.com
Mozafar Shah - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
holedev.com
holedev - Software Engineering
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
juandk.com
Juan | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
adamrdev.com
Adam Reeves - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
justinhoyt.com
Justin Hoyt - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
adamrideout.net
Adam Rideout - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
aurigabriel.com
Auri Gabriel - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
burakcanga.com
Burak Çanga - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
redakass.com
Reda Kassame - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
aboff.com
Michael Aboff - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
adhamov.com
Zaha — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.