Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to callmephilip.com

callmephilip | Home · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
luciost.dev
Portfolio | Home
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
gaareth.com
Gareth - Homepage
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
a2va.dev
A2va | Home
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
caiocarvalho.dev
Caio Carvalho
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
alexlazcano.dev
Alex Lazcano
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
simoncw.com
Simon says | Home
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
craiggiles.com
Craig Giles | Home
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
0pointer.org
0pointer.org | Home
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
sinavahidi.dev
Sina | Personal Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
overstated.dev
Home | Overstated
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
angry-dev-thoughts.com
Angry dev thoughts - Software developers are sometimes angry
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
lprakashv.com
LALIT's TECH BLOG | Home
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
juancwu.dev
Juan Wu | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
papafe.dev
Papafe
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
thatbrothacodes.com
thatbrothacodes | Software development from a brotha's perspective
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
hitaesh.com
Hitaesh's Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
lowlevelgenius.com
Low Level Genius
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
ashfid.dev
Home
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.