Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to callistersoftware.com

Callister Software Ltd · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
poasoftware.com
POA Software Ltd.
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
anjukaranji.com
Anju Karanji - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
ankacakan.com
Anka Cakan - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
ethancervera.com
Ethan Cervera | Jr Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
sutersoftware.dev
Suter Software Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
ankanpal.com
Ankan Pal | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
mackcore.io
Mack Core | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
modernsoftware.net
Modern Software
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
reuss.dev
Tobias Reuß | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
dtmconsulting.co.uk 🇬🇧
DTM | Web App and Software Development Agency
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
cakenes.com
Cakenes - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
itsarvind.com
Arvind Dhindsa · Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
livesoftware.com.au 🇦🇺
Live Software | Web Consulting Australia
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
calculated-code.com
calculatedCode | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
reynersubrata.com
Reyner Subrata | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
anzsoftwaresolution.com
ANZ Software
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
heinsoe.com
Hein Soe | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
sharmayash.com
Yash Sharma | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.