Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to calebhart.dev

Welcome to my Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
82match
mshahsavar.com
Welcome to My Page | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
pablourena.com
Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
hokheng.com
Hok's Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
fyralabs.com
Welcome to Fyra Labs
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
hiveonos.com
Welcome to || Hiveon
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
alexarraiza.dev
Alex's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
abinayan.com
Abinayan | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
luisaamouri.com
Luisa's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
alexmccairel.dev
Alex McCairel | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
aldodev.org
Aldo Lucchetta - Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
ejmudrak.com
Erik Mudrak's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
acemito.com
Welcome to CtoolAi Support Center
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
adamcbright.com
Welcome to Adam's Website
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
cousall.com
Chris Cousall | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
furqanali.com
Furqan Ali — Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
thanhorama.com
Thanh Tran | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
andrewmcguckin.com
Andrew McGuckin - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
alexarthur.me
Alex Arthur - Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.