similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to calebguice.com

calebguice.com – Author Site · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

Daniel J. Rothery – Author Site

2 shared topicsfiction

Henry Coles | author site

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

dlleeauthor.com

D.L. Lee – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

Ly Faulk – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

anneboothauthor.com

Anne Booth – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Apeksha Rao – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

Helen Goltz – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

G.B. Gillean – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

maciecraven.com

Macie Craven – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

esbarrison-author.com

E.S. Barrison – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

heididaniele.com

HEIDI DANIELE – AUTHOR

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

iveeolivares.com

Ivee Olivares – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

angelasweeney.com

Angela Sweeney – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

anthonysegarrabooks.com

Anthony Segarra – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

caitlynsurkein.com

Caitlyn Surkein – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

camillashelley.com

Camilla Shelley – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

mahriadoucette.com

Mahria Doucette – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

anitahalvorssen.com

Anita Halvorssen – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.