Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to caldwellian.dev

Don Caldwell — Design Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
atomparish.com
Adam Parish — Design Engineer
2 shared topicsdesign
74match
lucaspita.com
Lucas Pita — Product Design Engineer
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
3laws.studio
3LAWS — Human. Ethic. Design.
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
reillydesignstudio.com
ReillyDesignStudio™ — Design That Moves People™
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
annamira.net
Anna Mira | Design Platform Lead
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
atefehdesign.com
Atefeh Freid — Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
craigmaherportfolio.com
Craig Maher | Senior UX Designer · AI Strategy & Product Design
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
creativenoyes.com
Creative Noyes — Design Systems, AI Tooling, Product Design
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
futurebriefclub.com
AI + Design Insights for Creatives | Future Brief Club
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
acroative.com
Home - Acroative Designs
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
andrewcdesign.com
Andrew Christopher — Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
66match
luanabraun.com
Luana Braun — Staff Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
66match
8px.ai
8px - AI Design Tool
2 shared topicsdesign
66match
aceanusha.com
Anusha Shearin Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
66match
lopezsanabria.com
Turo López Sanabria — Agentic Design Systems and Design Ops
2 shared topicsdesign
66match
reedenger.com
Reed Enger, history and design
2 shared topicsdesign
66match
simonlhuillier.com
Simon Lhuillier — Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
66match
simpleia.com
Simpleia — AI-Amplified Product Design
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.