Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to calculated-code.com

calculatedCode | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
81match
heinsoe.com
Hein Soe | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
lwebb.dev
Logan Webb | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
ankanpal.com
Ankan Pal | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
antipotion.com
Antipotion | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
helmyl.com
Helmy Luqmanulhakim - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
obarsal.dev
Rubar Ozan Barsal | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
anjukaranji.com
Anju Karanji - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
konin.dev
Max Konin | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
reuss.dev
Tobias Reuß | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
gedasga.com
GedasGa | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
sharmayash.com
Yash Sharma | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
antaresjeet.com
Ranjit | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
connorburri.com
Connor Burri | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
ivinay.dev
Vinay Naik | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
dixonjo.com
Joshua Dixon | Software Engineer & Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
shaunasaunders.com
Shauna Saunders - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
ricardofearing.com
Ricardo Fearing - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
connortabora.com
Connor Tabora | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.