Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to cakici.dev

Mustafa Yılmaz Çakıcı · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
63match
lyerko.com
Yucheng Yan
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
angusmorton.com
All posts | Angus Morton
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
luxtedfive.dev
Luxted 5
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
rforanalytics.com
R for Data Analytics
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
rhishikesh.com
Polyglot Artisan
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
henrytchen.com
Hi! I'm Henry
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
madebynox.com
Hello, I'm nox
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
confound.io
Confound
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
itprogramminghq.com
IT Programming HQ: Resources for programmers who are getting started.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
machak.com
|machak.com|
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
rfaqs.com
R Programming FAQs - MCQs, Tutorials, Tips, Data Analysis, Visualization
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
distasis.com
DISTASIS
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
kodejunction.com
Home - kodejunction.com
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
rexamples.com
R Examples
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
heinjs.com
hein
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
hermitmath.com
孤寂之森
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
camel-case.com
Camel Case Converter & Guide | Definition, Usage, Examples
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
constraint-programming.com
constraint-programming.org
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.