similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to caitjohnson.com

Cait Johnson – author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

anniewilsonbooks.com

Annie Wilson – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Shara Moon – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

susangriffinauthor.com

Susan Griffin – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Basma Akram – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Isla Stuart – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Suzy Senior – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

annasequoia.com

Anna Sequoia – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

beabirdsong.com

Bea Birdsong – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Caia Winter – Author.

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

heidishamsuddin.com

Heidi Shamsuddin – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Anna B. Moore – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

itsokaytowonder.com

Rhonda Wagner – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

rhondawagnerbook.com

Rhonda Wagner – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

angelamenziesbooks.com

Angela Menzies – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

bculverjr – Author Page

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

m2turnerauthor.com

Michele Turner – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

richoettinger.com

rich oettinger – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

susanmarchese.com

Susan Marchese – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.