Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to caiterlenbach.com

Cait Yaga | author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
100match
caityaga.com
Cait Yaga | author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
camdenmichaeljones.com
- Educator | Author
2 shared topicspoetry
70match
anneethompson.com
Anne E Thompson | Author
2 shared topicspoetry
69match
annaparadowska.com
Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
dipishakalura.com
Dipisha Kalura | Author, Poet & Storyteller
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
gdshaffer.com
G.D. Shaffer, Author
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
andreapaul.com
Andrea Paul - Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
moiramckinnon.com
Moira McKinnon | Author of Cicada
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
gbennetthumphrey.com
G Bennett Humphrey | Author - Home
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
susanlhart.com
Susan L Hart / Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
susantekulve.com
Susan Tekulve ~ Author
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
anjasnellmanbooks.com
Author Anja Snellman
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
anjlishahauthor.com
Diverse and Inclusive Stories | Anjli Shah Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
gayathriprabhu.com
gayathri prabhu – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
shaunasilva.com
Shauna Silva: Blogger and Author.​ - Home
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
suzanneelson.com
Suzanne Elson Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
calistaashmore.com
Austin Poet Calista Ashmore – Author of My Iridescent Daggers
2 shared topicspoetry
66match
constance-camille.com
Constance Camille – AUTHOR & POET
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.