Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to caiocarvalho.dev

Caio Carvalho · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
alexlazcano.dev
Alex Lazcano
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
gaareth.com
Gareth - Homepage
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
lukasdohmen.com
Lukas Dohmen
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
adamreidelbach.com
Adam Reidelbach
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
angry-dev-thoughts.com
Angry dev thoughts - Software developers are sometimes angry
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
juancwu.dev
Juan Wu | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
papafe.dev
Papafe
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
egorikas.com
Egor Grishechko's Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
hitaesh.com
Hitaesh's Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
callmephilip.com
callmephilip | Home
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
asyncadventures.com
Async Adventures
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
aaronlindsay.dev
Aaron Lindsay | Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
luisferhenriquez.com
Developer Portfolio | Terminal v1.0.5
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
aissam.me
Aissam Belhachmi
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
lukegrehan.com
Luke Grehan
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
andrewlin.dev
Bork | Andrew Lin
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
agingdeveloper.net
The Aging Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
atulsharma.dev
Atul’s Blog - Atul Sharma
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.