Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to caioandrade.dev

Caio Andrade · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
andrezorn.dev
Andre Zorn
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
andrewnbishop.com
Andrew Bishop – Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
junlongk.com
Jun Long - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
andrewnessin.com
Andrew Nessin
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
mscharhag.com
Michael Scharhag's software development blog about Java technologies including Java EE, Spring and REST
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
alexandralim.dev
Alexandra Lim | Front End Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
andrewrcr.dev
Andrew Creekmore - Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andrewcreekmore.dev
Andrew Creekmore - Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
adammackintosh.net
Adam Mackintosh's portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
mshaf.com
Muhammad Shafeeq
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
lukezerona.dev
Luke Zerona Portfolio | Software Engineer (C/C++, React, Java, Python)
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
mryujitanaka.com
Yuji Tanaka - Java Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
alessandrorossi.tech
Alessandro Rossi — Fullstack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
andrewcoder.dev
Portfolio | Andrew Nicholson
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
jurnalanas.com
Jurnal Anas - Software developer, builder, and amateur writer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
andrewxu.tech
Andrew Xu | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
adammiszczak.com
Adam Miszczak
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
edcharbeneau.com
Ed Charbeneau: .NET, JavaScript, and C# articles
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.