Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to caferati.dev

Rafael Caferati | Award-Winning Pragmatic Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
anuragp.com
Anurag Pramanik - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
kofimupati.com
Kofi Mupati | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
hekdev.com
Erik Kleiman — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
heyitsravi.com
Ravi Prakash — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
heinsoe.com
Hein Soe | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
isosman.com
Islam Osman | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
highbeek.dev
Ibukun Agboola | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
antaresjeet.com
Ranjit | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
angelumeh.com
Angel Umeh | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
angelumeh.dev
Angel Umeh | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
ethanloh.com
Ethan Loh — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
ogiogidayo.com
Eiji Ogiwara | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
3raul.com
Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
dirkdevelops.com
Dirk Knibbe — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
shaquib.dev
Shaquib Imdad | Full Stack Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
ankanpal.com
Ankan Pal | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
ivinay.dev
Vinay Naik | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
anjukaranji.com
Anju Karanji - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.