Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to cafemac.net

Home Page | caféMac · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
atlmanagedservices.com
Home Page - Cortavo
1 shared topicsit-and-internet-support
73match
cortavo.com
Home Page - Cortavo
1 shared topicsit-and-internet-support
73match
eis-gcc.com
Home Page
1 shared topicsit-and-internet-support
73match
panaven.com
Home Page
1 shared topicsit-and-internet-support
73match
recomcomputers.com
Home Page
1 shared topicsit-and-internet-support
73match
tgunsconsulting.com
Home Page
1 shared topicsit-and-internet-support
73match
team-it.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home Page
1 shared topicsit-and-internet-support
71match
sidimage.com
Home page - SiDWeb
1 shared topicsit-and-internet-support
71match
the-computer-aid.com
Homepage | Computer Aid
1 shared topicsit-and-internet-support
71match
digidogtech.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home Page - DigiDog
1 shared topicsit-and-internet-support
70match
tezlagroup.com
Home Page - Tezla Group
1 shared topicsit-and-internet-support
70match
thedigitalofficenow.com
Levifi - Home Page
1 shared topicsit-and-internet-support
70match
techzoo.co.uk 🇬🇧
TECH ZOO Home Page
1 shared topicsit-and-internet-support
70match
lowthers.com
Home Page - K Lowther & Co Ltd
1 shared topicsit-and-internet-support
70match
2access.net
WCOIL - Home Page
1 shared topicsit-and-internet-support
69match
acorntreeconsulting.com
Acorntree Consulting Home Page
1 shared topicsit-and-internet-support
69match
julinar.com
Home Page - Julinar It Solutions
1 shared topicsit-and-internet-support
69match
sundog-consulting.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home Page - Sundog Consulting
1 shared topicsit-and-internet-support

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.