Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to caestley.com

CÆSTLEY SOFTWARE · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
4legssoftware.com
4 Legs Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
dkdsoftware.com
DKD Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
bigxsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Big X Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
planvs.com
creact.dev software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
emaksoftware.in 🇮🇳
emaksoftware
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
coultersoftware.ca 🇨🇦
Coulter Software
2 shared topicscloud-computing
69match
islandersoftware.com
Islander Software
2 shared topicscloud-computing
69match
swatian.com
Swatian Software Works
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
fyfesoftware.ca 🇨🇦
Fyfe Software Inc.
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
moprostride.com
Moprostride Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
incloudsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
inCLOUD Software Ltd
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
nuvesoft.com
Nuvesoft - Cloud Based Application Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
dmesoftwaresolutions.com
DME Software Solutions
2 shared topicscloud-computing
68match
mogoj.com
Mogoj Software Pvt. Ltd.
2 shared topicscloud-computing
67match
nuvianix.com
Nuvianix - Modern Software Solutions
2 shared topicscloud-computing
67match
iitsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home - IIT Software Limited
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
nyamwangeb.com
bryson nyamwange — software engineer
2 shared topicscloud-computing
67match
bd-software.com
BD-Software Limited
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.