Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to cadehaddockstrong.com

Cade Haddock Strong – Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
juliadebarrioz.com
JULIA DEBARRIOZ – Author
2 shared topicsromance
69match
lslayne.com
L.S. Layne – Author Website
2 shared topicsromance
68match
holleighrae.com
Holleigh Rae | Author
2 shared topicsromance
68match
jterbeek.com
JD Rivers - SFF Author
2 shared topicsromance
67match
atkumagai.com
a.t.kumagai – Fantasy Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
67match
reginapaul.com
Regina Paul Author
2 shared topicsromance
67match
sinagami.com
JJSin & Shinigami, Authors
2 shared topicsromance
66match
loveelisemckenna.com
Elise Mckenna – My author site.
2 shared topicsromance
66match
caitlynmccrea.com
Caitlyn McCrea – Romantasy Author
2 shared topicsromance
66match
lornafaith.com
Lorna Faith – Clean Fiction Author
2 shared topicsromance
65match
brynneweaverbooks.com
Romance Author | Brynne Weaver Books
2 shared topicsromance
65match
pacelestina.com
P.A. Celestina | Fantasy Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
65match
lorimatsourani.com
Lori Matsourani, Author – Romance Enthusiast and Writer/Blogger
2 shared topicsromance
65match
rebeccamain.com
Rebecca Main — Paranormal Romance Author — Follow the Magic – A Darker Shade of Paranormal Magic
2 shared topicsromance
65match
reginaruddmerrick.com
Regina Rudd Merrick - Inspirational Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
65match
sigridspice.com
Sigrid Spice – Dark Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
65match
juliaflorrieauthor.com
Julia Florrie Author - Home
2 shared topicsromance
65match
tessaharperauthor.com
Tessa Harper - Fantasy and Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.