Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to cachesjs.com

CachesJS · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
anmolteaches.com
Anmol Teaches
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
gazel.io
Gazel - Documentation
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
kothawale.com
Akash Kothawale | de-cached
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
annotatorjs.com
Home - Annotator
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
mootorial.com
MooTools Essentials - Official JavaScript & Ajax Guide
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
komarivskyi.com
Viacheslav Komarivskyi - JavaScript Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
iwouldrathercode.com
iwouldrathercode.com | iwouldrathercode.github.io
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
contection.dev
Contection
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
koloska.dev
Koloska - Because Coding is our Passion
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
apiwork.dev
Apiwork
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
gdgguelph.com
Google Developer Group on Campus | University of Guelph
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
plainjs.com
plainJS - The Vanilla JavaScript Repository
2 shared topicsweb-development
61match
cafjslabs.com
Home | Cafj.s Framework
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
angeliramirez.com
Angeli Ramirez - Full-stack Developer | Portfolio & Projects
2 shared topicsweb-development
61match
anhatsingh.com
Anhat Singh - Developer Profile
2 shared topicsweb-development
61match
context-coders.com
ctx
2 shared topicsweb-development
61match
dinosaur-dev.com
The Dinosaur Dev
2 shared topicsweb-development
61match
henhenmuldani.com
Henhen Imam M - Web Developer, Android Developer, and Coding Teacher
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.