Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to cacfeedback.com

C12 CAC Feedback Portal · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
rheyoh.com
Rheyoh Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
itsrimu.com
Rimu
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
monke-erc.com
$MONKE
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
a-nation-usa.com
A Nation
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
digoperator.com
GrowthOS
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
estherkatana.com
Esther Katana
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
shareaminute.com
Share A Minute
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
bay-3.com
Bay 3 — Fleet Ops
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
campustoclarity.com
Campus to Clarity Accelerator
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
retroflow.app
Collaborative Feedback Platform
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
ethanlozoya.com
App Portal
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
dmis-dev.com
MIS Portal
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
resolvekit.dev
ResolveKit – In-app feedback intake for app teams
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
docsplorer.com
Portal
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
mopinion.com
Mopinion Feedback for Websites, Apps and Email
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
1tenteraportal.com
1Tentera Portal
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
appero.co.uk 🇬🇧
In-app product feedback that drives growth | Appero
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
reunionmsports.com
Reunion Admin Portal
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.