Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to cablespaghetti.dev

Cablespaghetti · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
cables.gl
cables
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
cableslinger.com
CableSlinger
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
lorenzobaronio.com
Code & Cables By Lorenzo
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
pablosarabia.com
codeless.me
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
andrewchantra.com
andrewchantra
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
countableset.com
countableset
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
craigpardey.com
Craig Pardey
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
ehdn.com
Welcome - Portfolio Jon Cable
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
lovelacecode.com
NEOBYTES - Just another Tech blog...
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
burchett.dev
Matt Burchett
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andrewtruong.com
Notes and Code | notes
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
buboreader.com
Bubo Reader
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
funcburger.com
Funcburger
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
burhaantargett.tech
TargetCode TargetCode My collection of random net wisdom - including my own...!
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
9koala.com
9koala Information sharing and downloading
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
juliengenestoux.com
All posts | Ouvre Boite
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
julien51.com
All posts | Ouvre Boite
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
cosmicrevolutions.com
Cosmic Revolutions | Technology, Civilization and the World of Tomorrow
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.