Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to c4cexcellence.com

Center for Counseling Excellence · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
c5counselingcenter.org
C5 Counseling Center
1 shared topicsmental-health
72match
recentercounselling.com
Recenter Counselling
1 shared topicsmental-health
72match
affinitycounselingcenter.com
Affinity Counseling Center
1 shared topicsmental-health
72match
hopecounselingmn.com
– Hope Counseling Center
1 shared topicsmental-health
71match
cambridgecounselingcenter.org
Cambridge Counseling Center
1 shared topicsmental-health
71match
cambridgecounselingcenter.net
Cambridge Counseling Center
1 shared topicsmental-health
71match
4thdoorcounseling.com
4th Door Counseling
1 shared topicsmental-health
71match
lotuscounselingmn.com
Lotus Counseling Center, LLC
1 shared topicsmental-health
71match
counselingedge.com
Counseling Edge
1 shared topicsmental-health
70match
cramercounseling.com
Cramer Counseling
1 shared topicsmental-health
70match
c4vl.com
Center for Valued Living | Colorado Counseling & Therapy
1 shared topicsmental-health
70match
accounselinglicsw.com
AC Counseling
1 shared topicsmental-health
70match
counselingatcela.com
The Counseling Center at CELA – CELA
1 shared topicsmental-health
70match
2ndstarcounseling.com
2nd Star Counseling
1 shared topicsmental-health
70match
bmw-counseling.com
BBB Counseling
1 shared topicsmental-health
70match
alisataylorcounseling.com
Alisa Taylor Counseling - Home
1 shared topicsmental-health
70match
biolacounselingcenter.org
Home Page - Biola Counseling Center
1 shared topicsmental-health
70match
counselingcabin.com
The Counseling Cabin
1 shared topicsmental-health

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.