Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to c-mac.me

C-Mac.me – Christina Warren's Rarely Updated Website · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
relevelleveler.com
The Relevel leveleR website – —
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
simonwoodtli.com
Simon's Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
julianloiacono.com
Julian's Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
ludusamo.com
Brendan's Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
actiondorp.net
Craig Kohler – Personal Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
alexpreston.org
Alex Preston's website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
8bitben.org
Craig Kohler – Personal Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
cpbergin.com
Conor Bergin's Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
craigkoh.com
Craig Kohler – Personal Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
craigkohler.com
Craig Kohler – Personal Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
simartin.dev
Simon Martin's website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
texasktp.com
KTP Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
bulmus.org
Taygun's Personal Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
0k-loh.dev
Kelvin's Personal Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
craaazydeal.com
Craaazy Deal – Leading Tech Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
reidswan.com
Reid Swan – Reid's personal website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
c2vi.dev
c2vi's Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
calebsharp.dev
caleb's website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.